AI regulatory compliance

Know what AI regulations mean for your systems.

Understand which requirements apply, connect them to supporting evidence, and see what needs attention. We’re building RegulationCheck to keep that picture current as your AI systems and the rules change.

  • ✓ Live regulation tracker
  • ✓ Focused €1,000 sprint
  • ✓ Preliminary screening
Illustrative workspace · sample data
Overview AI inventory Assessments Readiness tasks Reports
Regulation Check demoAI readiness
+ Add system
AI systems128 assessed
Needs review3facts incomplete
Open actions94 due soon
Readiness progress
68%

17 of 25 actions complete

Needs attentionView all
  • Applicant rankingUse case needs reviewReview
  • Support copilotEvidence to review2 tasks
  • Meeting summaryReview recordedCurrent

A connected record for

System contextRequirementsEvidenceGaps and ownersReview history

The problem

Adding AI creates questions that don’t end at launch.

Which requirements apply to this use case? What evidence supports your assessment? Who owns the gaps? A new model, a different use case or a regulatory change can mean revisiting earlier decisions.

RegulationCheck brings those questions into one review process.

Why interpretation matters

The rules are public. Applying them takes context.

Requirements depend on what your system does, where it operates and your company’s role. You need to connect the relevant rules to your system’s facts, evidence and decisions—and understand when that assessment needs another look.

The product we’re building

A living record for each AI system.

We’re building a connected record of your system’s purpose, applicable requirements, supporting evidence, review decisions and outstanding gaps.

01

System context

What the AI does, where it operates and how it is used.

02

Applicable requirements

The rules relevant to that context.

03

Supporting evidence

Documents and test results linked to the assessment.

04

Gaps and owners

What needs attention and who is responsible.

05

Review history

What was decided, why, and what changes require reassessment.

The knowledge graph approach

Connect the rules to the decisions behind them.

Our knowledge graph approach links regulatory sources, system context, requirements, evidence and review decisions. The aim is to preserve the reasoning behind an assessment, reuse reviewed mappings where appropriate and identify what needs another look when something changes.

This connected assessment workflow is part of the product we’re building.

  1. 01
    Keep the reasoning

    See which facts and sources informed a review decision.

  2. 02
    Reuse reviewed work

    Carry forward a reviewed mapping when the context still fits.

  3. 03
    Know what to revisit

    Identify the evidence and decisions that need another look after a change.

Available today · live tracker

Follow AI regulation across jurisdictions.

Our live global regulation tracker brings AI regulatory developments into one place. The next step is connecting reviewed updates to the systems and assessment decisions they affect.

Explore the tracker

Practical resources

Start with the evidence question in front of you.

Use our source-linked checklists to prepare a buyer review, map EU AI Act readiness, or assess an AI supplier.

Available today · first commercial offer

Start with one AI product.

The Evidence Passport Sprint is a focused first engagement to organise your product information, review the available evidence and identify gaps.

Enquire about the sprint

View a fictional sample

Open your workspace
€1,000, paid upfront

One AI product and a 60-minute working session.

Preliminary EU AI Act screening

Up to 20 team-approved answers and a gap register.

Workspace and PDF handoff

Delivery within five business days after both the session and receipt of the agreed evidence.

Focused scope

No legal opinion, certification, full audit or compliance guarantee. Does not include completing a buyer’s full questionnaire, new policies or controls, or counsel approval.

Planned next step · ongoing review

Keep the record useful as things change.

The longer-term plan is ongoing review: maintaining system facts, identifying relevant changes and refreshing the evidence and decisions affected by them.

Common questions

What to expect.

Is RegulationCheck only about the EU AI Act?

The initial sprint focuses on the EU AI Act. The broader product direction covers AI regulatory requirements across jurisdictions, supported by the global tracker. Full assessments across those jurisdictions are not available today.

Does RegulationCheck monitor or correct AI outputs?

The focus is regulatory requirements, evidence and review decisions. Testing system behaviour can support an assessment. We do not offer automatic monitoring or correction of AI outputs.

Does this guarantee compliance?

No. The sprint supports compliance readiness and helps identify gaps. It does not provide certification or replace legal advice where needed.

What is available today?

The €1,000 Evidence Passport Sprint and live regulation tracker are available today. We’re building the connected assessment record and graph integration. Ongoing review is planned; automated impact analysis is not part of the published offer.

The Evidence Passport Sprint

Start with a clearer picture of one AI product.

Explore the Evidence Passport SprintView the sample passport

Your privacy choices

Essential storage keeps this site working. Optional saved content and visitor statistics stay off until you allow them.

Cookie policy